SURVEY OF INCOME AND PROGRAM PARTICIPATION, 2004 PANEL WAVE 5 TOPICAL MODULE FILE DATA DICTIONARY DATA SIZE BEGIN D SSUSEQ 5 1 T SU: Sequence Number of Sample Unit - Primary Sort Key U All persons V 1:65000 .Sequence Number D SSUID 12 6 T SU: Sample Unit Identifier Sample Unit identifier This identifier is created by scrambling together the PSU, Segment, Serial, Serial Suffix of the original sample address. It may be used in matching sample units from different waves. U All persons V 000000000000:999999999999 .Scrambled Id D SPANEL 4 18 T SU: Sample Code - Indicates Panel Year U All persons V 2004 .Panel Year D SWAVE 2 22 T SU: Wave of data collection There were 8 waves of data collection in the 2004 Panel U All persons V 1:8 .Wave of data collection D SROTATON 1 24 T SU: Rotation of data collection Rotation within wave. Each wave of data is collected over a four calendar month period. The rotation field indicates which month within the wave a particular interview was conducted. U All persons V 1:4 .Rotation of data collection D TFIPSST 2 25 T HH: FIPS State Code FIPS State Code Federal Information Processing Standards state (and state equivalent) code for the 50 states, and DC. U All persons V 01 .Alabama V 02 .Alaska V 04 .Arizona V 05 .Arkansas V 06 .California V 08 .Colorado V 09 .Connecticut V 10 .Delaware V 11 .DC V 12 .Florida V 13 .Georgia V 15 .Hawaii V 16 .Idaho V 17 .Illinois V 18 .Indiana V 19 .Iowa V 20 .Kansas V 21 .Kentucky V 22 .Louisiana V 23 .Maine V 24 .Maryland V 25 .Massachusetts V 26 .Michigan V 27 .Minnesota V 28 .Mississippi V 29 .Missouri V 30 .Montana V 31 .Nebraska V 32 .Nevada V 33 .New Hampshire V 34 .New Jersey V 35 .New Mexico V 36 .New York V 37 .North Carolina V 38 .North Dakota V 39 .Ohio V 40 .Oklahoma V 41 .Oregon V 42 .Pennsylvania V 44 .Rhode Island V 45 .South Carolina V 46 .South Dakota V 47 .Tennessee V 48 .Texas V 49 .Utah V 50 .Vermont V 51 .Virginia V 53 .Washington V 54 .West Virginia V 55 .Wisconsin V 56 .Wyoming D SHHADID 3 27 T SU: Hhld Address ID differentiates hhlds in sample unit Household Address ID. This field differentiates households within the sample PSU, segment, serial, serial suffix; that is, households spawned from an original sample household. U All persons V 011:119 .Household Address ID D EOUTCOME 3 30 T HH: Interview Status code for this household U All persons in households V 201 .Completed interview V 203 .Compl. partial- missing data; no V .TYPE-Z V 207 .Complete partial - TYPE-Z; no V .futher followup V 213 .TYPE-A, language problem V 216 .TYPE-A, no one home (noh) V 217 .TYPE-A, temporarily absent (ta) V 218 .TYPE-A, hh refused V 219 .TYPE-A, other occupied (specify) V 234 .TYPE-B, entire hh institut. or V .temp. ineligible V 248 .TYPE-C, other (specify) V 249 .TYPE-C, sample adjustment V 250 .TYPE-C, hh deceased V 251 .TYPE-C, moved out of country V 252 .TYPE-C, living in armed forces V .barracks V 253 .TYPE-C, on active duty in Armed V .Forces V 254 .TYPE-C, no one over age 15 years V .in household V 255 .TYPE-C, no Wave 1 persons V .remaining in household V 260 .TYPE-D, moved address unknown V .-SPAWN V 261 .TYPE-D, moved within U.S. but V .outside SIPP -SPAWN V 262 .TYPE-C, merged with another SIPP V .household V 270 .TYPE-C, mover, no longer located V .in FR's area -PARENT V 271 .TYPE-C, mover, new address V .located in same FR's area V .-PARENT V 280 .TYPE-D, mover, no longer located V .in FR's assignment area V .-SPAWN D RFID 3 33 T FA: Family ID Number for this month Family ID number may be used to identify all persons in the same family in a given month. This ID is used for primary families, unrelated subfamilies, and primary and secondary individuals. Persons in related subfamilies have the primary family ID in this field. U All persons V 1:120 .Family ID number D RFID2 3 36 T FA: Family ID excluding related subfamily members Family ID number excluding members of related subfamilies. This ID is used for all persons except related subfamily members. U All persons except those in related subfamilies (excludes persons with ESFTYPE = 2) V 1:120 .Family ID number V -1 .Not in Universe D EPPIDX 3 39 T Person index Person index. This field differentiates persons within the sample unit. Person index is unique within the sample unit and wave. U All persons V 1:999 .Person index D EENTAID 3 42 T PE: Address ID of hhld where person entered sample Address ID of the household that this person belonged to at the time this person first became part of the sample. U All persons V 011:119 .Entry address ID D EPPPNUM 4 45 T PE: Person number Person number. This field differentiates persons within the sample unit. Person number is unique within the sample unit. U All persons V 0101:1199 .Person Number D EPOPSTAT 1 49 T PE: Population status based on age in 4th reference month Population status. This field identifies whether or not a person was eligible to be asked a full set of questions, based on his/her age in the fourth month of the reference period. U All persons V 1 .Adult (15 years of age or older) V 2 .Child (Under 15 years of age) D EPPINTVW 2 50 T PE: Person's interview status U All persons V 1 .Interview (self) V 2 .Interview (proxy) V 3 .Noninterview - Type Z V 4 .Noninterview - pseudo Type Z. V .Left sample during the V .reference period V 5 .Children under 15 during V .reference period D EPPMIS4 1 52 T Person's 4th month interview status Person''s interview status for month 4 U All persons V 1 .Interview V 2 .Non-interview D ESEX 1 53 T PE: Sex of this person U All persons V 1 .MALE V 2 .FEMALE D ERACE 1 54 T PE: The race(s) the respondent is What race(s) does ... consider herself/himself to be? 1 White 2 Black or African American 3 American Indian or Alaska Native 4 Asian 5 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander U All persons V 1 .White alone V 2 .Black alone V 3 .Asian alone V 4 .Residual D EORIGIN 2 55 T PE: Spanish, Hispanic or Latino Is ... Spanish, Hispanic or Latino? U All persons V 2 .No V 1 .Yes D WPFINWGT 10 57 T WW: Person weight Final person weight Four implied decimal postions U All persons V 0.0000:999999.9999 .Final person weight D ERRP 2 67 T PE: Household relationship U All persons V 1 .Reference person with related V .persons in household V 2 .Reference Person without related V .persons in household V 3 .Spouse of reference person V 4 .Child of reference person V 5 .Grandchild of reference person V 6 .Parent of reference person V 7 .Brother/sister of reference person V 8 .Other relative of reference person V 9 .Foster child of reference person V 10 .Unmarried partner of reference V .person V 11 .Housemate/roommate V 12 .Roomer/boarder V 13 .Other non-relative of reference V .person D TAGE 2 69 T PE: Age as of last birthday Edited and imputed age as of last birthday. Topcoding combines persons into last two single year of age groups. User should combine last two age groups for microdata analysis. U All persons V 0 .Less than 1 full year old V 1:88 .Number of years old D EMS 1 71 T PE: Marital status U All persons V 1 .Married, spouse present V 2 .Married, spouse absent V 3 .Widowed V 4 .Divorced V 5 .Separated V 6 .Never Married D EPNSPOUS 4 72 T PE: Person number of spouse U All persons V 0101:1199 .Person Number V 9999 .Spouse not in household or person V .not married D EPNMOM 4 76 T PE: Person number of mother U All persons V 0101:1199 .Person Number V 9999 .No mother in household D EPNDAD 4 80 T PE: Person number of father U All persons V 0101:1199 .Person Number V 9999 .No father in household D EPNGUARD 4 84 T PE: Person number of guardian U All persons, 19 years and under TAGE < 20 for this month V 0101:1199 .Person Number V 9999 .Guardian not in household V -1 .Not in Universe D RDESGPNT 2 88 T PE: Designated parent or guardian flag Is ... the designated parent or guardian of children under age 18 who live in this household? U All persons 15+ at the end of the reference period. EPOPSTAT = 1 V -1 .Not in Universe V 1 .Yes V 2 .No D EEDUCATE 2 90 T ED: Highest Degree received or grade completed What is the highest level of school ... has completed or the highest degree ... has received? NOTE: The answer choices of the educational attainment variable, EEDUCATE, have been revised beginning in the 2004 Panel. The answer choice of "42" has been deleted for this variable. U All persons age 15 and over V 31 .Less Than 1st Grade V 32 .1st, 2nd, 3rd or 4th grade V 33 .5th Or 6th Grade V 34 .7th Or 8th Grade V 35 .9th Grade V 36 .10th Grade V 37 .11th Grade V 38 .12th grade, no diploma V 39 .High School Graduate - (diploma V .or GED or equivalent) V 40 .Some college, but no degree V 41 .Diploma or certificate from a V .vocational, technical, V .trade or business school V .beyond high V 43 .Associate (2-yr) college degree V .(include V .academic/occupational V .degree) V 44 .Bachelor's degree (for example: V .BA, AB, BS) V 45 .Master's degree (For example: MA, V .MS, MEng, MEd, MSW, MBA) V 46 .Professional School degree (for V .example: MD,(doctor),DDS V .(dentist),JD(lawyer) V 47 .Doctorate degree (for example: V .Ph.D., Ed.D) V -1 .Not in Universe D LGTKEY 8 92 T PE: Person longitudinal key NOTE: This variable is not used on the Preliminary Wave 1 file. The longitudinal key is in sort by scrambled id (SSUID). The first five digits of the key contain a longitudinal sequence number which is unique for the sample unit across all waves. The last three digits contain a person''s index which identifies a person within a sample unit and is unique for a person across all waves. This key can be used to merge people longitudinally. U All persons V 1001:70000001 .Longitudinal Key D SINTHHID 3 100 T SU: Hhld Address ID of person in interview month Address ID of this person at time of interview (fifth month). V 0 .Not In Universe V 011:119 .Household Address ID D EASEUNV 2 103 T SE: Universe indicator Universe indicator V 1 .In universe V -1 .Not in Universe D RENROLD 2 105 T SE: Whether person was ever enrolled in past 12 months SE_02,SE_03,RENROLL and AENROLL wave 3,4,5 Has the person ever been enrolled in school in the past 12 MONTHS? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D AENROLD 1 107 T SE: Allocation flag for RENROLD SE_02,SE_03,RENROLL and AENROLL wave 3,4,5 Allocation flag for whether the person was enrolled in school V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D RFLPTIME 2 108 T SE: Whether the student was enrolled full or part-time SE_04A,SE_04B,RENROLL wave 3,4,5 During the period(s) of enrollment in the PAST 12 MONTHS, was the student enrolled MOSTLY full-time or part-time? V 2 .Part Time V 1 .Full Time V -1 .Not in Universe D AFLPTIME 1 110 T SE: Allocation flag for RFLPTIME SE_04A,SE_04B,RENROLL wave 3,4,5 Allocation flag for whether the student was enrolled mostly full-time or part-time in the past 12 months V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EGRLEVEL 2 111 T SE: Grade person was enrolled SE05,EENLEVEL (wave 3,4,5 core variable grade level of student), EEDUCATE (core variable from current wave of highest grade level) At what level or grade was the student enrolled for MOST of the past 12 months? V 10 .Enrolled in college, but not V .working towards degree V 9 .Vocational, technical or business V .school beyond high school V .level V 8 .College year 6+ (Second year or V .higher in graduate or V .professional school) V 7 .College year 5 (first year V .graduate or professional V .school) V 6 .College year 4 (senior) V 5 .College year 3 (junior) V 4 .College year 2 (sophomore) V 3 .College year 1 (freshman) V 2 .High school grades 9-12 V 1 .Elementary grades 1-8 V -1 .Not in Universe D AGRLEVEL 1 113 T SE: Allocation flag for EGRLEVEL SE05,EENLEVEL (wave 3,4,5 core variable grade level of student), EEDUCATE (core variable from current wave of highest grade level) Allocation flag for at what level or grade was/were ... enrolled for MOST of the past 12 months? V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D RIOSTATE 2 114 T SE: School in-state/out-of-state most of past 12 months SE07, GHFIPSST (Census state code) Was the student going to school in-state or out-of-state for MOST of the time in the past 12 months? V 2 .In-state student V 1 .Out-of-state student V -1 .Not in Universe D AIOSTATE 1 116 T SE: Allocation flag for RIOSTATE SE07, GHFIPSST (Census state code) Allocation flag for whether the student was enrolled in-state or out-of-state for most of the past 12 months V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EPUBPRIV 2 117 T SE: Whether public or private SE12 Was the student's school a public or private school? V 2 .Private V 1 .Public V -1 .Not in Universe D APUBPRIV 1 119 T SE: Allocation flag for EPUBPRIV SE12 Allocation flag for whether the school is public or private V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D RDEGREE 2 120 T SE: Type of degree the student is working toward SE05,SE14 What degree or certificate was the student working toward for MOST of the time enrolled? V 8 .Enrolled in college, but not V .working towards a degree V 7 .Other license, diploma, or V .certificate V 6 .Professional (MD, DDS, DVM, Law, V .etc) V 5 .Doctorate V 4 .Master's V 3 .Bachelor's V 2 .Associate degree - general arts V .and sciences V 1 .Associate Degree - Occupational V -1 .Not in Universe D ADEGREE 1 122 T SE: Allocation flag for RDEGREE SE05,SE14 Allocation flag for the type of degree the student is working toward V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EFIELD 2 123 T SE: Major field of study SE15 What was the student's major field of study? V 17 .No major V 16 .Other V 15 .Vocational - technical studies V .(law enforcement,drafting, V .etc) V 14 .Social sciences V .(history,economics, V .sociology, psychology, V .political science,etc) V 13 .Physical or earth science V 12 .Mathematics or statistics V 11 .Liberal arts or humanities V .(arts,religion,music,languages,p- V .hilosophy,etc) V 10 .Law V 9 .Home Economics V 8 .Health, nursing, medical V 7 .English or journalism V 6 .Engineering V 5 .Education V 4 .Computer science V 3 .Business, commerce, accounting, V .management V 2 .Biological science V 1 .Agriculture or forestry V -1 .Not in Universe D AFIELD 1 125 T SE: Allocation flag for EFIELD SE15 Allocation flag for the student's major field of study V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TTUITION 5 126 T SE: Recoded amount paid for tuition and fees SE16,SE17,SE18,SE19 During the PAST 12 MONTHS, what was the total cost of the student's tuition and fees? V 25000 .$25,000+ V 22000 .$19,000 - 24,999 V 17000 .$15,000 - 18,999 V 13000 .$11,000 - 14,999 V 9500 .$8,000 - 10,999 V 7500 .$7,000 - 7,999 V 6500 .$6,000 - 6,999 V 5500 .$5,000 - 5,999 V 4500 .$4,000 - 4,999 V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:3999 .Amount in dollars D ATUITION 1 131 T SE: Allocation flag for TTUITION SE16,SE17,SE18,SE19 Allocation flag for the amount paid for tuition and fees for the past 12 months. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D RFULLCST 2 132 T SE: Recoded variable of whether payment was full tuition SE16,SE17,SE18,SE19 Was this the FULL cost for tuition and fees, or was it a reduced amount because the student received some kind of a tuition reduction, scholarship, or other assistance? V 2 .No, lowered cost V 1 .Yes, full cost V -1 .Not in Universe D AFULLCST 1 134 T SE: Allocation flag for RFULLCST SE16,SE17,SE18,SE19 Allocation flag for whether the payment was for the full cost of tuition or a reduced amount V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TAMTASST 5 135 T SE: Recoded amount of tuition reduction SE19,SE16 What was the amount of the tuition reduction received? V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:30000 .Amount in dollar D AAMTASST 1 140 T SE: Allocation flag for TAMTASST SE19,SE16 Allocation flag for the amount of the student's tuition reduction V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TOTHCOST 4 141 T SE: Total cost of books, supplies and equipment SE20 During the PAST 12 MONTHS, what was the total cost of the student's books,supplies and other equipment before any discounts or waivers? V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:2500 .Amount in dollars D AOTHCOST 1 145 T SE: Allocation flag for TOTHCOST SE20 Allocation flag for the total cost of books, supplies and equipment V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D RLWPAR 2 146 T SE: Whether student lived with parents or guardian SE21 While the student was attending school during the PAST 12 MONTHS, did the student live with his/her parents or guardians? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ALWPAR 1 148 T SE: Allocation flag for RLWPAR SE21 Allocation flag for whether the student lived with his/her parents while attending school during the past 12 months V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TCSTRMB 5 149 T SE: Cost of room and board without discounts/waivers SE23 During the PAST 12 MONTHS, what was the total cost of the student's room and board before any discounts or waivers? V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:15000 .Amount in dollars D ACSTRMB 1 154 T SE: Allocation flag for TCSTRMB SE23 Allocation flag for the cost of room and board before any discounts or waivers V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TCSTTRAN 4 155 T SE: Cost of transportation to permanent home SE24 During the PAST 12 MONTHS, how much was spent on the student's transportation to his/her permanent home? V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:3000 .Amount in dollars D ACSTTRAN 1 159 T SE: Allocation flag for TCSTTRAN SE24 Allocation flag for the cost of the transportation to his/her permanent home during the past 12 months V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D REDAID01 2 160 T SE: Whether the student received a Pell grant SE29@1,SE26,SE27,SE28,EASST01(wave 3,4,5) Did the student receive a Pell grant? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D REDAID02 2 162 T SE: Whether the student received veteran's benefits SE29@2,SE26,SE27,SE28,EASST02(wave 3,4,5) Did the student receive veteran's benefits? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D REDAID03 2 164 T SE: Whether the student received work study SE29@3,SE26,SE27,SE28,EASST03(wave 3,4,5) Did the student receive work study? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D REDAID04 2 166 T SE: Whether student received any other federal grant SE29@4,SE26,SE27,SE28,EASST04(wave 3,4,5) Did the student receive any other federal grant or program? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D REDAID05 2 168 T SE: Whether the student received a loan SE29@5,SE26,SE27,SE28,EASST05(wave 3,4,5) Did the student receive a loan? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D REDAID06 2 170 T SE: Whether the student received aid from the school SE29@6,SE26,SE27,SE28,EASST06(wave 3,4,5) Did the student receive a grant, scholarship, or tuition remission from the school attended? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D REDAID07 2 172 T SE: Whether the student received an assistantship SE29@7,SE26,SE27,SE28,EASST07(wave 3,4,5) Did the student receive a teaching or research assistantship from the school attended? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D REDAID08 2 174 T SE: Whether the student received state aid SE29@8,SE26,SE27,SE28,EASST08(wave 3,4,5) Did the student receive a grant or scholarship from the state? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D REDAID09 2 176 T SE: Whether student received other grants/scholarships SE29@9,SE26,SE27,SE28,EASST09(wave 3,4,5) Did the student receive a grant or scholarship from some other source? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D REDAID10 2 178 T SE: Whether the student received employer assistance SE29@10,SE26,SE27,SE28,EASST10(wave 3,4,5) Did the student receive assistance from his/her employer? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D REDAID11 2 180 T SE: Whether the student received aid from other source SE29@11,SE26,SE27,SE28,EASST11(wave 3,4,5) Did the student receive aid from some other source? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D AEDAID 1 182 T SE: Allocation flag for REDAID01- REDAID11 SE29@1-S- E29@11,SE26,SE27,SE28,EASST01-EASST11 (wave 3,4,5) Allocation flag for whether the student received any financial aid V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TEDAMT01 3 183 T SE: Percent of total asst from Pell grant SE30_1,SE30E_1 What percent did the student receive from his/her Pell grant? V 0 .Not In Universe V -2 .Don't Know V -3 .Refused V -4 .Received, but no amount given V 1:100 .Percentage received D TEDAMT02 3 186 T SE: Percent of total asst from VA benefits SE30_2,SE30E_2 What percent did the student receive from his/her veteran's benefits? V 0 .Not In Universe V -2 .Don't Know V -3 .Refused V -4 .Received, but no amount given V 1:100 .Percentage received D TEDAMT03 3 189 T SE: Percent of total asst from work study SE30_3,SE30E_3 What percent did the student receive from his/her work study? V 0 .Not In Universe V -2 .Don't Know V -3 .Refused V -4 .Received, but no amount given V 1:100 .Percentage received D TEDAMT04 3 192 T SE: Percent of total asst from other federal aid SE30_4,SE30E_4 What percent did the student receive from his/her other federal grants (excluding Pell)? V 0 .Not In Universe V -2 .Don't Know V -3 .Refused V -4 .Received, but no amount given V 1:100 .Percentage received D TEDAMT05 3 195 T SE: Percent of total asst from a loan SE30_5,SE30E_5 What percent did the student receive from his/her loan? V 0 .Not In Universe V -2 .Don't Know V -3 .Refused V -4 .Received, but no amount given V 1:100 .Percentage received D TEDAMT06 3 198 T SE: Percent of total asst from aid from the school SE30_6,SE30E_6 What percent did the student receive from his/her aid granted by the school ? V 0 .Not In Universe V -2 .Don't Know V -3 .Refused V -4 .Received, but no amount given V 1:100 .Percentage received D TEDAMT07 3 201 T SE: Percent of total asst from the school SE30_7,SE30E_7 What percent did the student receive from his/her teaching or research assistantship from the school? V 0 .Not In Universe V -2 .Don't Know V -3 .Refused V -4 .Received, but no amount given V 1:100 .Percentage received D TEDAMT08 3 204 T SE: Percent of total asst from state aid SE30_8,SE30E_8 What percent did the student receive from his/her grant or scholarship from the state? V 0 .Not In Universe V -2 .Don't Know V -3 .Refused V -4 .Received, but no amount given V 1:100 .Percentage received D TEDAMT09 3 207 T SE: Percent of total asst from other grants/scholarships SE30_9,SE30E_9 What percent did the student receive from his/her other grants or scholarships? V 0 .Not In Universe V -2 .Don't Know V -3 .Refused V -4 .Received, but no amount given V 1:100 .Percentage received D TEDAMT10 3 210 T SE: Percent of total asst from employer assistance SE30_10,SE30E_10 What percent did the student receive from his/her employer? V 0 .Not In Universe V -2 .Don't Know V -3 .Refused V -4 .Received, but no amount given V 1:100 .Percentage received D TEDAMT11 3 213 T SE: Percent of total asst from any other source SE30_11,SE30E_11 What percent did the student receive from any other source? V 0 .Not In Universe V -2 .Don't Know V -3 .Refused V -4 .Received, but no amount given V 1:100 .Percentage received D TTOTAMT 5 216 T SE: Total aid the student received in the past 12 months TEDAMT01 thru TEDAMT11 How much did the student receive in the past 12 months from all sources of aid? Variable created from the sum of REDAMT01- REDAMT11 V 25000 .$25,000+ V 22000 .$19,000 - 24,999 V 17000 .$15,000 - 18,999 V 13000 .$11,000 - 14,999 V 10000 .$9,000 - 10,999 V 8000 .$7,000 - 8,999 V 6500 .$6,000 - 6,999 V 5500 .$5,000 - 5,999 V 4500 .$4,000 - 4,999 V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:3999 .Amount in dollars D ATOTAMT 1 221 T SE: Allocation flag for TTOTAMT TEDAMT01 thru TEDAMT11 Allocation flag for the total amount of financial aid received by the student V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EDPNTAX 2 222 T SE: Whether student claimed on parent's/guardian's tax NOTE: DATA SUPPRESSED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY SE50 Was the student claimed as a dependent on his/her parent's or guardian's tax form for 2004 (filed in April, 2005)? V 0 .Suppressed D ADPNTAX 1 224 T SE: Allocation flag for EDPNTAX NOTE: DATA SUPPRESSED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY SE50 Allocation flag for whether the student was claimed as a dependent on parent's or guardian's tax form V 0 .Suppressed D ELOANSGN 2 225 T SE: Who signed for the student loan SE32 I recorded that the student received money from a student loan. Did the student cosign with someone else? V 3 .Both the student and someone else V .signed V 2 .Someone else signed V 1 .No, only self-signed V -1 .Not in Universe D ALOANSGN 1 227 T SE: Allocation flag for ELOANSGN SE32 Allocation flag for who signed for the student loan. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D ERELSIGN 2 228 T SE: Relationship of the loan signer to the student SE33 What is the relationship of the signer to the student? V 3 .Someone else V 2 .Spouse V 1 .Parent or guardian V -1 .Not in Universe D ARELSIGN 1 230 T SE: Allocation flag for ERELSIGN SE33 Allocation flag for the relationship of the signer of the student loan to the student. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D ERLCOSGN 2 231 T SE: Relationship of the loan cosigner to the student SE34 What is the relationship of the cosigner to the student? V 3 .Someone else V 2 .Spouse V 1 .Parent or guardian V -1 .Not in Universe D ARLCOSGN 1 233 T SE: Allocation flag for ERLCOSGN SE34 Allocation flag for the relationship of the cosigner of the student loan to the student. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TSELFAMT 5 234 T SE: Amount the student contributed to education costs SE35 Aside from student aid, loans, and family support, how much did the student contribute to his/her education costs over the PAST 12 MONTHS? V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:10000 .Amount in dollars D ASELFAMT 1 239 T SE: Allocation flag for TSELFAMT SE35 Allocation flag for the amount the student contributed to his/her education cost over the past 12 months. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EEMPREQ 2 240 T SE: If it is an employer requirement to attend school SE38 I recorded that the student received financial assistance from his/her employer. Does the student's employer require him/her to attend school to maintain skills at his/her current job, to retrain for another job, for a promotion or higher salary, or for some other reason? (Choose only one.) V 4 .No, some other reason or not V .required by employer V 3 .Yes, requirement for V .PROMOTION/HIGHER SALARY V 2 .Yes, Requirement for RETRAINING V .for another job V 1 .Yes, requirement for MAINTAINING V .skills in current job V -1 .Not in Universe D AEMPREQ 1 242 T SE: Allocation flag for EEMPREQ SE38 Allocation flag for whether or not the student's employer required the student to attend school and, if required, the reason for the requirement. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EEMPGRD 2 243 T SE: Employer's grade requirement SE39 Is the student required to receive a minimum grade or higher in his/her coursework to receive tuition assistance from his/her employer? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D AEMPGRD 1 245 T SE: Allocation flag for EEMPGRD SE39 Allocation flag for whether the student is required to receive a minimum grade to receive tuition assistance from his/her employer. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EEMPOBLG 2 246 T SE: Employer's requirement for work continuance SE40 Is the student required to continue working with his/her employer after completion of coursework in order to receive his/her employer's tuition assistance? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D AEMPOBLG 1 248 T SE: Allocation flag for EEMPOBLG SE40 Allocation flag for whether the student is required to continue working after completion in order to receive assistance V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EEMPTIME 2 249 T SE: Months of stay owed employer for education aid SE41 For how many months is the student required to stay after completing the coursework? V 0 .Less than 1 month V -1 .Not in Universe V 1:60 .Months D AEMPTIME 1 251 T SE: Allocation flag for EEMPTIME SE41 Allocation flag for how many months the student is required to stay at work after completing the coursework V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EEMPRELT 2 252 T SE: Whether coursework must relate to work SE42 Does the coursework have to be related to the student's current work in order to receive his/her employer's tuition assistance? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D AEMPRELT 1 254 T SE: Allocation flag for EEMPRELT SE42 Allocation flag for whether the coursework has to be related to the current work to receive employer's assistance V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EWRKHRS 2 255 T SE: If allowed to take class during work hours SE43 Is the student allowed to take classes during work hours? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D AWRKHRS 1 257 T SE: Allocation flag for EWRKHRS SE43 Allocation flag for whether the student is allowed to take classes during work hours V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EPDTIMCL 2 258 T SE: Whether employer pays for time spent in class SE44 Is the student paid by his/her employer for time spent in class? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D APDTIMCL 1 260 T SE: Allocation flag for EPDTIMCL SE44 Allocation flag for whether the student is paid by the employer for time spent in class V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EACSUNV 2 261 T CS: Universe indicator. Universe indicator. V 1 .In universe V -1 .Not in Universe D ECSKID01 4 263 T CS: Person number of first child. Person number of the first child who is eligible for the child support edit V -1 .Not in Universe V 101:1199 .Person number of first child D ECSKID02 4 267 T CS: Person number of second child. Person number of the second child who is eligible for the child support edit V -1 .Not in Universe V 101:1199 .Person number of second child D ECSKID03 4 271 T CS: Person number of third child. Person number of the third child who is eligible for the child support edit V -1 .Not in Universe V 101:1199 .Person number of second child D ECSKID04 4 275 T CS: Person number of fourth child. Person number of the fourth child who is eligible for the child support edit V -1 .Not in Universe V 101:1199 .Person number of second child D ECSKID05 4 279 T CS: Person number of fifth child. Person number of the fifth child who is eligible for the child support edit V -1 .Not in Universe V 101:1199 .Person number of second child D ECSKID06 4 283 T CS: Person number of sixth child. Person number of the sixth child who is eligible for the child support edit V -1 .Not in Universe V 101:1199 .Person number of second child D ECSKID07 4 287 T CS: Person number of seventh child. Person number of the seventh child who is eligible for the child support edit V -1 .Not in Universe V 101:1199 .Person number of second child D ECSKID08 4 291 T CS: Person number of eighth child. Person number of the eighth child who is eligible for the child support edit V -1 .Not in Universe V 101:1199 .Person number of second child D ECSKID09 4 295 T CS: Person number of ninth child. Person number of the ninth child who is eligible for the child support edit V -1 .Not in Universe V 101:1199 .Person number of second child D ECSKID10 4 299 T CS: Person number of tenth child. Person number of the tenth child who is eligible for the child support edit V -1 .Not in Universe V 101:1199 .Person number of second child D EYNOAB01 2 303 T CS: Parent not living outside of household CS05 Why doesn't [FIRST child] have a biological or adoptive parent living outside the household? V 10 .Other V 9 .Child was adopted by a single V .parent V 8 .Other parent is no longer V .recognized as a parent by V .this HH V 7 .Other parent legally terminated V .their parental rights V 6 .Other Parent lives elsewhere V 5 .Don't know where child's other V .parent is V 4 .Don't want contact with child's V .other parent V 3 .Parents are separated/divorced V 2 .Both parents live in the household V 1 .Other parent has died V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNOAB02 2 305 T CS: Parent not living outside of household CS05 Why doesn't [SECOND child] have a biological or adoptive parent living outside the household? V 10 .Other V 9 .Child was adopted by a single V .parent V 8 .Other parent is no longer V .recognized as a parent by V .this household, V 7 .Other parent legally terminated V .their parental rights V 6 .Other Parent lives elsewhere V 5 .Don't know where child's other V .parent is V 4 .Don't want contact with child's V .other parent V 3 .Parents are separated/divorced V 2 .Both parents live in the household V 1 .Other parent has died V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNOAB03 2 307 T CS: Parent not living outside of household CS05 Why doesn't [THIRD child] have a biological or adoptive parent living outside the household? V 10 .Other V 9 .Child was adopted by a single V .parent V 8 .Other parent is no longer V .recognized as a parent by V .this household, V 7 .Other parent legally terminated V .their parental rights V 6 .Other Parent lives elsewhere V 5 .Don't know where child's other V .parent is V 4 .Don't want contact with child's V .other parent V 3 .Parents are separated/divorced V 2 .Both parents live in the household V 1 .Other parent has died V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNOAB04 2 309 T CS: Parent not living outside of household CS05 Why doesn't [FOURTH child] have a biological or adoptive parent living outside the household? V 10 .Other V 9 .Child was adopted by a single V .parent V 8 .Other parent is no longer V .recognized as a parent by V .this household, V 7 .Other parent legally terminated V .their parental rights V 6 .Other Parent lives elsewhere V 5 .Don't know where child's other V .parent is V 4 .Don't want contact with child's V .other parent V 3 .Parents are separated/divorced V 2 .Both parents live in the household V 1 .Other parent has died V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNOAB05 2 311 T CS: Parent not living outside of household CS05 Why doesn't [FIFTH child] have a biological or adoptive parent living outside the household? V 10 .Other V 9 .Child was adopted by a single V .parent V 8 .Other parent is no longer V .recognized as a parent by V .this household, V 7 .Other parent legally terminated V .their parental rights V 6 .Other Parent lives elsewhere V 5 .Don't know where child's other V .parent is V 4 .Don't want contact with child's V .other parent V 3 .Parents are separated/divorced V 2 .Both parents live in the household V 1 .Other parent has died V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNOAB06 2 313 T CS: Parent not living outside of household CS05 Why doesn't [SIXTH child] have a biological or adoptive parent living outside the household? V 10 .Other V 9 .Child was adopted by a single V .parent V 8 .Other parent is no longer V .recognized as a parent by V .this household, V 7 .Other parent legally terminated V .their parental rights V 6 .Other Parent lives elsewhere V 5 .Don't know where child's other V .parent is V 4 .Don't want contact with child's V .other parent V 3 .Parents are separated/divorced V 2 .Both parents live in the household V 1 .Other parent has died V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNOAB07 2 315 T CS: Parent not living outside of household CS05 Why doesn't [SEVENTH child] have a biological or adoptive parent living outside the household? V 10 .Other V 9 .Child was adopted by a single V .parent V 8 .Other parent is no longer V .recognized as a parent by V .this household, V 7 .Other parent legally terminated V .their parental rights V 6 .Other Parent lives elsewhere V 5 .Don't know where child's other V .parent is V 4 .Don't want contact with child's V .other parent V 3 .Parents are separated/divorced V 2 .Both parents live in the household V 1 .Other parent has died V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNOAB08 2 317 T CS: Parent not living outside of household CS05 Why doesn't [EIGHTH child] have a biological or adoptive parent living outside the household? V 10 .Other V 9 .Child was adopted by a single V .parent V 8 .Other parent is no longer V .recognized as a parent by V .this household, V 7 .Other parent legally terminated V .their parental rights V 6 .Other Parent lives elsewhere V 5 .Don't know where child's other V .parent is V 4 .Don't want contact with child's V .other parent V 3 .Parents are separated/divorced V 2 .Both parents live in the household V 1 .Other parent has died V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNOAB09 2 319 T CS: Parent not living outside of household CS05 Why doesn't [NINTH child] have a biological or adoptive parent living outside the household? V 10 .Other V 9 .Child was adopted by a single V .parent V 8 .Other parent is no longer V .recognized as a parent by V .this household, V 7 .Other parent legally terminated V .their parental rights V 6 .Other Parent lives elsewhere V 5 .Don't know where child's other V .parent is V 4 .Don't want contact with child's V .other parent V 3 .Parents are separated/divorced V 2 .Both parents live in the household V 1 .Other parent has died V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNOAB10 2 321 T CS: Parent not living outside of household CS05 Why doesn't [TENTH child] have a biological or adoptive parent living outside the household? V 10 .Other V 9 .Child was adopted by a single V .parent V 8 .Other parent is no longer V .recognized as a parent by V .this household, V 7 .Other parent legally terminated V .their parental rights V 6 .Other Parent lives elsewhere V 5 .Don't know where child's other V .parent is V 4 .Don't want contact with child's V .other parent V 3 .Parents are separated/divorced V 2 .Both parents live in the household V 1 .Other parent has died V -1 .Not in Universe D AYNOAB 1 323 T CS: Allocation flag for EYNOAB01-10 CS05 Allocation flag for the reason the children did not have a biological or adoptive parent living outside the household. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D RECRDFLG 2 324 T CS: Record indicator. Was the entire record imputed? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ECSFLG01 2 326 T CS: Child support coverage indicator Is the FIRST child covered by a child support agreement? -1 Not in universe 1 Covered by the most recent child support agreement 2 Covered by some other child support agreement 3 Not covered by a child support agreement. 4 Not eligible for supplement because other parent is deceased, still living in the household, but not acknowledged by respondent, legally terminated their parental rights, or gave up child for adoption (i.e. respondent is a single adoptive parent). V 4 .Not eligible for supplement V 3 .Not covered by a child support V .agreement. V 2 .Covered by some other child V .support agreement V 1 .Covered by the most recent child V .support agreement V -1 .Not in Universe D ECSFLG02 2 328 T CS: Child support coverage indicator Is the SECOND child covered by a child support agreement? -1 Not in universe 1 Covered by the most recent child support agreement 2 Covered by some other child support agreement 3 Not covered by a child support agreement. 4 Not eligible for supplement because other parent is deceased, still living in the household, but not acknowledged by respondent, legally terminated their parental rights, or gave up child for adoption (i.e. respondent is a single adoptive parent). V 4 .Not eligible for supplement V 3 .Not covered by a child support V .agreement. V 2 .Covered by some other child V .support agreement V 1 .Covered by the most recent child V .support agreement V -1 .Not in Universe D ECSFLG03 2 330 T CS: Child support coverage indicator Is the THIRD child covered by a child support agreement? -1 Not in universe 1 Covered by the most recent child support agreement 2 Covered by some other child support agreement 3 Not covered by a child support agreement. 4 Not eligible for supplement because other parent is deceased, still living in the household, but not acknowledged by respondent, legally terminated their parental rights, or gave up child for adoption (i.e. respondent is a single adoptive parent). V 4 .Not eligible for supplement V 3 .Not covered by a child support V .agreement. V 2 .Covered by some other child V .support agreement V 1 .Covered by the most recent child V .support agreement V -1 .Not in Universe D ECSFLG04 2 332 T CS: Child support coverage indicator Is the FOURTH child covered by a child support agreement? -1 Not in universe 1 Covered by the most recent child support agreement 2 Covered by some other child support agreement 3 Not covered by a child support agreement. 4 Not eligible for supplement because other parent is deceased, still living in the household, but not acknowledged by respondent, legally terminated their parental rights, or gave up child for adoption (i.e. respondent is a single adoptive parent). V 4 .Not eligible for supplement V 3 .Not covered by a child support V .agreement. V 2 .Covered by some other child V .support agreement V 1 .Covered by the most recent child V .support agreement V -1 .Not in Universe D ECSFLG05 2 334 T CS: Child support coverage indicator Is the FIFTH child covered by a child support agreement? -1 Not in universe 1 Covered by the most recent child support agreement 2 Covered by some other child support agreement 3 Not covered by a child support agreement. 4 Not eligible for supplement because other parent is deceased, still living in the household, but not acknowledged by respondent, legally terminated their parental rights, or gave up child for adoption (i.e. respondent is a single adoptive parent). V 4 .Not eligible for supplement V 3 .Not covered by a child support V .agreement. V 2 .Covered by some other child V .support agreement V 1 .Covered by the most recent child V .support agreement V -1 .Not in Universe D ECSFLG06 2 336 T CS: Child support coverage indicator Is the SIXTH child covered by a child support agreement? -1 Not in universe 1 Covered by the most recent child support agreement 2 Covered by some other child support agreement 3 Not covered by a child support agreement. 4 Not eligible for supplement because other parent is deceased, still living in the household, but not acknowledged by respondent, legally terminated their parental rights, or gave up child for adoption (i.e. respondent is a single adoptive parent). V 4 .Not eligible for supplement V 3 .Not covered by a child support V .agreement. V 2 .Covered by some other child V .support agreement V 1 .Covered by the most recent child V .support agreement V -1 .Not in Universe D ECSFLG07 2 338 T CS: Child support coverage indicator Is the SEVENTH child covered by a child support agreement? -1 Not in universe 1 Covered by the most recent child support agreement 2 Covered by some other child support agreement 3 Not covered by a child support agreement. 4 Not eligible for supplement because other parent is deceased, still living in the household, but not acknowledged by respondent, legally terminated their parental rights, or gave up child for adoption (i.e. respondent is a single adoptive parent). V 4 .Not eligible for supplement V 3 .Not covered by a child support V .agreement. V 2 .Covered by some other child V .support agreement V 1 .Covered by the most recent child V .support agreement V -1 .Not in Universe D ECSFLG08 2 340 T CS: Child support coverage indicator Is the EIGHTH child covered by a child support agreement? -1 Not in universe 1 Covered by the most recent child support agreement 2 Covered by some other child support agreement 3 Not covered by a child support agreement. 4 Not eligible for supplement because other parent is deceased, still living in the household, but not acknowledged by respondent, legally terminated their parental rights, or gave up child for adoption (i.e. respondent is a single adoptive parent). V 4 .Not eligible for supplement V 3 .Not covered by a child support V .agreement. V 2 .Covered by some other child V .support agreement V 1 .Covered by the most recent child V .support agreement V -1 .Not in Universe D ECSFLG09 2 342 T CS: Child support coverage indicator Is the NINTH child covered by a child support agreement? -1 Not in universe 1 Covered by the most recent child support agreement 2 Covered by some other child support agreement 3 Not covered by a child support agreement. 4 Not eligible for supplement because other parent is deceased, still living in the household, but not acknowledged by respondent, legally terminated their parental rights, or gave up child for adoption (i.e. respondent is a single adoptive parent). V 4 .Not eligible for supplement V 3 .Not covered by a child support V .agreement. V 2 .Covered by some other child V .support agreement V 1 .Covered by the most recent child V .support agreement V -1 .Not in Universe D ECSFLG10 2 344 T CS: Child support coverage indicator Is the TENTH child covered by a child support agreement? -1 Not in universe 1 Covered by the most recent child support agreement 2 Covered by some other child support agreement 3 Not covered by a child support agreement. 4 Not eligible for supplement because other parent is deceased, still living in the household, but not acknowledged by respondent, legally terminated their parental rights, or gave up child for adoption (i.e. respondent is a single adoptive parent). V 4 .Not eligible for supplement V 3 .Not covered by a child support V .agreement. V 2 .Covered by some other child V .support agreement V 1 .Covered by the most recent child V .support agreement V -1 .Not in Universe D ACSFLG 1 346 T CS: Allocation flag for ECSFLG01-10 Allocation flag for children covered by a child support agreement V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D RANYAGRE 2 347 T CS: Child support payments ever agreed to or awarded Have child support agreements ever been agreed to or awarded for any children? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D TNUMAGR 2 349 T CS: Number of child support agreements CS14 How many different child support agreements cover these children? V 2 .Number of agreements V -1 .Not in Universe D ANUMAGR 1 351 T CS: Allocation flag for TNUMAGR CS14 Allocation flag for the number of different child support agreements V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D ETYPEAGR 2 352 T CS: Type of child support agreements CS17 Was this a voluntary written agreement ratified by the court, a court-ordered agreement, some other type of written agreement, or a non-written (verbal) agreement? V 4 .A non-written verbal agreement V 3 .Other type of written agreement V 2 .Court-ordered agreement V 1 .Voluntary written agreement V .ratified by the court V -1 .Not in Universe D ATYPEAGR 1 354 T CS: Allocation flag for ETYPEAGR CS17 Allocation flag for type of child support agreement V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EFIRSYR1 4 355 T CS: Year the agreement was first reached CS18 In what year was this agreement FIRST reached? V -1 .Not in Universe V 1984:2005 .Year the agreement was first V .reached D AFIRSYR1 1 359 T CS: Allocation flag for EFIRSYR1 CS18 Allocation flag for the year the agreement was first reached V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TAMTAG11 4 360 T CS: Amount of support agreement CS19@AMT What was the dollar amount of the agreement? If paid weekly the top value is 200 If paid biweekly the top value is 775 If paid monthly the top value is 1200 If paid yearly the top value is 3000 V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:3000 .Amount in dollars D EAMTAG12 2 364 T CS: Frequency of payment CS19@1 What was the frequency of payment of that agreement? V 4 .Per year V 3 .Per month V 2 .Biweekly V 1 .Per week V -1 .Not in Universe D AAMTAG11 1 366 T CS: Allocation flag for TAMTAG11 AND EAMTAG12 CS19@AMT-CS19@1 Allocation flag for the amount and frequency of payments V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EEVRCHG1 2 367 T CS: Dollar amount change CS22 Has the dollar amount ever changed? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D AEVRCHG1 1 369 T CS: Allocation flag for EEVRCHG1 CS22 Allocation flag for whether the dollar amount ever changed V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EYRCHNG1 4 370 T CS: Year the amount was last changed CS23 In what year was this agreement LAST reached? V -1 .Not in Universe V 1984:2005 .Year the amount was last changed D AYRCHNG1 1 374 T CS: Allocation flag for EYRCHNG1 CS23 Allocation flag for the year the amount was changed V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TAMTCG11 4 375 T CS: The dollar amount for the agreement CS24@AMT What was the dollar amount for the agreement after the last change? If paid weekly the top value is 500 If paid biweekly the top value is 700 If paid monthly the top value is 1300 If paid yearly the top value is 350 V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:1300 .Dollar amount D EAMTCG12 2 379 T CS: Frequency of payment CS24@1 What was the frequency of payment of that agreement? V 4 .Per year V 3 .Per month V 2 .Biweekly V 1 .Per week V -1 .Not in Universe D AAMTCG11 1 381 T CS: Allocation flag for TAMTCG11 AND EAMTCG12 CS24@AMT, CS24@1 Allocation flag for the dollar amount of the agreement after the last change and the frequency that dollar amount was paid. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EWHOCHGD 2 382 T CS: Change made by government agency CS27 Was that change made or agreed to by a government agency such as a court or child support agency? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D AWHOCHGD 1 384 T CS: Allocation flag for EWHOCHGD CS27 Allocation flag for whether that change was made or agreed to by a government agency such as a court or child support agency. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EPAYDUE1 2 385 T CS: Payments due for agreement CS28 Were any payments due in the last 12 months? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D APAYDUE1 1 387 T CS: Allocation flag for EPAYDUE1 CS28 Allocation flag for whether any payments were due in the last 12 months. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EYNODUE1 2 388 T CS: Reason payment was not due CS29 Why weren't any payments due during that period (last 12 months)? V 5 .Other reason V 4 .Payment suspended by court or V .child support agency V 3 .Other parent in jail or V .institution V 2 .Other parent not working V 1 .Child(ren) over the age limit V -1 .Not in Universe D AYNODUE1 1 390 T CS: Allocation flag for EYNODUE1 CS29 Allocation flag for the reason payments were not due in that period (last 12 months). V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TAMTSUP1 5 391 T CS: The dollar amount of child support agreements CS30@AMT What was the total dollar amount of child support payments from the most recent agreement that you were supposed to receive during that period (last 12 months)? V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:15500 .Dollar amount D AAMTSUP1 1 396 T CS: Allocation flag for TAMTSUP1 CS30@AMT Allocation flag for the dollar amount of child support payments that are supposed to be received. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EHOWREC1 2 397 T CS: Ways payments are received CS33 How are these payments supposed to be received? Are they ...(READ RESPONSES) V 4 .Some other method V 3 .Through the welfare or child V .support agency V 2 .Through the court V 1 .Directly from the other parent V -1 .Not in Universe D AHOWREC1 1 399 T CS: Allocation flag for EHOWREC1 CS33 Allocation flag for the ways payments are supposed to be received. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TACTREC1 5 400 T CS: Amount received for agreement CS34@AMT What is the total amount that ... actually received in child support payments under that agreement during that period (last 12 months)? V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:15500 .Dollar amount D AACTREC1 1 405 T CS: Allocation flag for TACTREC1 CS34@AMT Allocation flag for the total amount that the person actually received in child support payments under that agreement V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EALLPAY1 2 406 T CS: Received every single one of child support payments CS37A Did he/she....receive every single one of the child support payments that he/she was/were supposed to receive V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D AALLPAY1 1 408 T CS: Allocation flag for EALLPAY1 CS37A Allocation flag for for having received every single one of child support payments that were supposed to be received V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EPAYTIM1 2 409 T CS: Number of child support payments made on time CS37B Of the child support payments how many were received on time? V 4 .None of the time V 3 .Some of the time V 2 .Most of the time V 1 .All of the time V -1 .Not in Universe D APAYTIM1 1 411 T CS: Allocation flag for EPAYTIM1 CS37B Allocation flag for number of child support payments made on time V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EPAYFUL1 2 412 T CS: How many of the payments were for the full amount? CS37C For the child support payments received, how many of them were for the full amount ... was suppose to receive? V 4 .None V 3 .Some V 2 .Most V 1 .All V -1 .Not in Universe D APAYFUL1 1 414 T CS: Allocation flag for EPAYFUL1 CS37C Allocation flag for how many of the child support payments were for full amount? V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EDUBACK1 2 415 T CS: Did recent payment include back child support? CS38 Did most recent agreement for the past 12 months include payment for back child support? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ADUBACK1 1 417 T CS: Allocation flag for EDUBACK1 CS38 Allocation flag for most recent agreement for the past 12 months include payment for back child support? V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TDOLBAC1 4 418 T CS: How much child support owed was back payment? CS39 How much of the child support owed the last 12 months was considered back payment? V 0 .Not In Universe V 1:4000 .Dollars D ADOLBAC1 1 422 T CS: Allocation flag for TDOLBAC1 CS39 How much of the child support owed the last 12 months was considered back payment? V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EBACOWE1 2 423 T CS: Is .....owed any back payments? CS39C Is ... owed any back payments? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ABACOWE1 1 425 T CS: Allocation flag for EBACOWE1 CS39C Allocation flag for if....owed any back payments? V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TAMTOWE1 5 426 T CS: Amount of back payments owed to ..... CS39D To date, what is the amount of back payments owed to .....? V 0 .Not In Universe V 1:50000 .Dollars D AAMTOWE1 1 431 T CS: Allocation flag for TAMTOWE1 CS39D Allocation flag for amount of back payments owed to ..... V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TBACREC1 4 432 T CS: Amount of back payment actually received CS39G How much back payment did ....actually received the last 12 months? V 0 .Not In Universe V 1:2500 .Dollars D ABACREC1 1 436 T CS: Allocation flag for TBACREC1 CS39G Allocation flag for amount of back payment actually received the last 12 months V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EHTHAG11 2 437 T CS: Non-custodial parent to provide health insurance CS40@1 Is non-custodial parent to provide health insurance? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EHTHAG12 2 439 T CS: Custodial parent to provide health insurance CS40@2 Is custodial parent to provide health insurance? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EHTHAG13 2 441 T CS: Non-custodial parent to pay actual medical costs CS40@3 Is non-custodial parent to pay actual medical costs directly? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EHTHAG14 2 443 T CS: Child support payments include medical support CS40@4 Are child support payments to include cash medical support? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EHTHAG15 2 445 T CS: No provision for health insurance CS40@5 Are there no provisions for health insurance included in agreement? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EHTHAG16 2 447 T CS: Other provisions for health care costs CS40@6 Are there other provisions? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D AHTHAG11 1 449 T CS: Allocation flag for EHTHAG11-EHTHAG16 CS40@1-CS40@6 Allocation flag for the kinds of provisions for health care costs included in the child support agreement. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D ECUSTAG1 2 450 T CS: Child custody arrangements CS41 What child custody arrangements does the child support agreement for (READ CHILD NAMES ABOVE) specify? V 7 .Other custody arrangement V 6 .Split custody V 5 .Father legal and physical custody V 4 .Mother legal and physical custody V 3 .Joint Legal with father physical V .custody V 2 .Joint legal with mother physical V .custody V 1 .Joint legal and physical custody V -1 .Not in Universe D ACUSTAG1 1 452 T CS: Allocation flag for ECUSTAG1 CS41 Allocation flag for the child custody arrangements that the child support agreement for the child(ren)specifies. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D ESPENTM1 2 453 T CS: Time spent with other parent CS42 Does the child support agreement specify the amount of time that the child(ren) will spend with the other parent? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ASPENTM1 1 455 T CS: Allocation flag for ESPENTM1 CS42 Allocation flag for whether the child support agreement specifies the amount of time that the children will spend with the other parent. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D ESAMETM1 2 456 T CS: Time spent with other parent CS44 Did all the children spend about the same number of days with the other parent in the last 12 months? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ASAMETM1 1 458 T CS: Allocation flag for ESAMETM1 CS44 Allocation flag for whether the children spent about the same number of days with the other parent in the last 12 months. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EAMTTM11 3 459 T CS: Time spent with other parent in days CS45@DAYS What is the total amount of time [read names of children] spent with the other parent for the last 12 months? V -1 .Not in Universe V 0:366 .Number of days D EAMTTM12 2 462 T CS: Time spent with other parent in weeks CS45@WEEKS What is the total amount of time [read names of children] spent with the other parent from [month 4 of previous interview year] to [month 4 of the current interview year]. V -1 .Not in Universe V 0:52 .Number of weeks D EAMTTM13 2 464 T CS: Time spent with other parent in months CS45@MONTHS What is the total amount of time [read names of children] spent with the other parent from [month 4 of the previous interview year] to [month 4 of the current interview year]? V -1 .Not in Universe V 0:12 .Number of months D AAMTTM11 1 466 T CS: Allocation flag for EAMTTM11-EAMTTM13 CS45@DAYS, CS45@WEEKS, and CS45@MONTHS Allocation flag for the total amount of time spent with the other parent. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EWHERLV1 2 467 T CS: Place where other parent lives CS46 Where does the other parent now live? V 6 .Unknown V 5 .Other V 4 .Other parent now deceased V 3 .Different State V 2 .Same State (different county or V .city) V 1 .Same county or city V -1 .Not in Universe D AWHERLV1 1 469 T CS: Allocation flag for EWHERLV1 CS46 Allocation flag for the place where the other parent of the child(ren) now live(s). V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D ESTAGRE1 2 470 T CS: State where parent lives CS47 Do you and the other parent still live in the same State or States where the initial child support agreement was reached? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ASTAGRE1 1 472 T CS: Allocation flag for ESTAGRE1 CS47 Allocation flag for whether the parent and the other parent still live in the same State or States where the initial child support agreement was reached. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EWHOMOV1 2 473 T CS: Person that moved CS48 Who moved? V 3 .Both subject person and other V .parent V 2 .Other parent V 1 .Subject person V -1 .Not in Universe D AWHOMOV1 1 475 T CS: Allocation flag for EWHOMOV1 CS48 Allocation flag for the person that moved. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EFIRSYR2 4 476 T CS: Year the agreement was first reached CS49@YEAR In what year was this agreement FIRST reached? V -1 .Not in Universe V 1984:2005 .Year the agreement was first V .reached D AFIRSYR2 1 480 T CS: Allocation flag for EFIRSYR2 CS49@YEAR Allocation flag for the year the agreement was first reached V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TAMTAG21 4 481 T CS: Amount of support agreement CS50@AMT What was the dollar amount of the agreement? If paid weekly the top value is 150 If paid biweekly the top value is 400 If paid monthly the top value is 1500 If paid yearly the value is 1 (suppressed for disclosure avoidance) V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:1500 .Amount in dollars D EAMTAG22 2 485 T CS: Frequency of payment CS50@1 What was the frequency of payment of that agreement? V 4 .Per year V 3 .Per month V 2 .Biweekly V 1 .Per week V -1 .Not in Universe D AAMTAG21 1 487 T CS: Allocation flag for TAMTAG21 AND EAMTAG22 CS50@AMT and CS50@1 Allocation flag for the amount and frequency of payments V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EEVRCHG2 2 488 T CS: Dollar amount change CS53 Has the dollar amount ever changed? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D AEVRCHG2 1 490 T CS: Allocation flag for EEVRCHG2 CS53 Allocation flag for whether the dollar amount ever changed V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EYRCHNG2 4 491 T CS: Year the amount was last changed CS54@YEAR In what year was the amount LAST changed? V -1 .Not in Universe V 1984:2005 .Year the amount was last changed D AYRCHNG2 1 495 T CS: Allocation flag for EYRCHNG2 CS54@YEAR Allocation flag for the year the amount last changed V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TAMTCG21 3 496 T CS: The dollar amount for the agreement CS55@AMT What was the dollar amount for the agreement after the last change? If paid weekly the top value is 200 If paid biweekly the value is 1(suppressed for disclosure avoidance) If paid monthly the top value is 500 If paid yearly the value is 1 (suppressed for disclosure avoidance) V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:500 .Dollar amount D EAMTCG22 2 499 T CS: Frequency of payment CS55@1 What was the frequency of payment of that agreement? V 4 .Per year V 3 .Per month V 2 .Biweekly V 1 .Per week V -1 .Not in Universe D AAMTCG21 1 501 T CS: Allocation flag for TAMTCG21 AND EAMTCG22 CS55@AMT and CS55@1 Allocation flag for the dollar amount of the agreement after the last change and the frequency that dollar amount was paid. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EPAYDUE2 2 502 T CS: Payments due last year CS58 Were any payments due in the last 12 months? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D APAYDUE2 1 504 T CS: Allocation flag for EPAYDUE2 CS58 Allocation flag for whether any payments were due in the last 12 months. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EYNODUE2 2 505 T CS: Reasons payment was not due CS59 Why weren't any payments due during that period (in the last 12 months)? V 5 .Other reason V 4 .Payment suspended by court or V .child support agency V 3 .Other parent in jail or V .institution V 2 .Other parent not working V 1 .Child(ren) over the age limit V -1 .Not in Universe D AYNODUE2 1 507 T CS: Allocation flag for EYNODUE2 CS59 Allocation flag for the reason payments were not due in the last 12 months. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TAMTSUP2 5 508 T CS: The dollar amount of child support agreements CS60@AMT What was the total dollar amount of child support payments from the most recent agreement that ... was supposed to receive during that period (in the last 12 months)? V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:15500 .Dollar amount D AAMTSUP2 1 513 T CS: Allocation flag for TAMTSUP2 CS60@AMT Allocation flag for the dollar amount of child support payments that are supposed to be received. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TACTREC2 5 514 T CS: Amount received for agreement CS63@AMT What is the total amount that ... actually received in child support payments under that agreement during that period (in the last 12 months)? V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:15500 .Dollar amount D AACTREC2 1 519 T CS: Allocation flag for TACTREC2 CS63@AMT Allocation flag for the total amount that the person actually received in child support payments under that agreement V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EALLPAY2 2 520 T CS: Received everyone of the child support payments CS66A Did he/she....receive every single one of the child support payments that he/she was/were supposed to receive V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D AALLPAY2 1 522 T CS: Allocation flag for EALLPAY2 CS66A Allocation flag for for having received every single one of child support payments that were supposed to be received V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EPAYTIM2 2 523 T CS: Number of child support payments made on time CS66B Of the child support payments how many were received on time? V 4 .None of the time V 3 .Some of the time V 2 .Most of the time V 1 .All of the time V -1 .Not in Universe D APAYTIM2 1 525 T CS: Allocation flag for EPAYTIM2 CS66B Allocation flag for number of child support payments made on time. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EPAYFUL2 2 526 T CS: How many child support payments were for full amt? CS66C For the child support payments received, how many of them were for the full amount he/she.. was/were suppose to receive? V 4 .None V 3 .Some V 2 .Most V 1 .All V -1 .Not in Universe D APAYFUL2 1 528 T CS: Allocation flag for EPAYFUL2 CS66B Allocation flag for how many of the child support payments were for full amount? V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EDUBACK2 2 529 T CS: Did recent payment include back child support? CS67 Did most recent agreement for the past 12 months include payment for back child support? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ADUBACK2 1 531 T CS: Allocation flag for EDUBACK2 CS67 Allocation flag for most recent agreement for the past 12 months include payment for back child support? V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TDOLBAC2 3 532 T CS: How much child support owed was back payment? CS68 How much of the child support owed the last 12 months was considered back payment? NOTE: Data suppressed for disclosure avoidance V 1 .Data suppressed V 0 .Not In Universe D ADOLBAC2 1 535 T CS: Allocation flag for TDOLBAC2 CS68 How much of the child support owed the last 12 months was considered back payment? V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EBACOWE2 2 536 T CS: Is ... owed any back payments? CS68C Is ... owed any back payments? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ABACOWE2 1 538 T CS: Allocation flag for EBACOWE2 CS68C Allocation flag for if....owed any back payments? V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TAMTOWE2 5 539 T CS: Amount of back payments owed to ..... CS68D To date, what is the amount of back payments owed to .....? V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:15000 .Dollars D AAMTOWE2 1 544 T CS: Allocation flag for TAMTOWE2 CS68D Allocation flag for amount of back payments owed to ..... V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TBACREC2 3 545 T CS: Amount of back payment actually received CS68G How much back payment did ....actually received the last 12 months? V 0 .Not In Universe V 1:500 .Dollars D ABACREC2 1 548 T CS: Allocation flag for TBACREC2 CS68G Allocation flag for amount of back payment actually received the last 12 months V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EHLTAG21 2 549 T CS: Non-custodial parent to provide health insurance CS69@1 Is non-custodial parent to provide health insurance? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EHLTAG22 2 551 T CS: Custodial parent to provide health insurance CS69@2 Is custodial parent to provide health insurance? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EHLTAG23 2 553 T CS: Non-custodial parent to pay actual medical costs CS69@3 Is non-custodial parent to pay actual medical costs directly? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EHLTAG24 2 555 T CS: Child support payments include medical support CS69@4 Are child support payments to include cash medical support? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EHLTAG25 2 557 T CS: No provision for health insurance CS69@5 Are there no provisions for health insurance included in agreement? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EHLTAG26 2 559 T CS: Other provisions for health care costs CS69@6 Are there other provisions? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D AHLTAG21 1 561 T CS: Allocation flag for EHTHAG21-EHTHAG26 CS69@1-CS69@6 Allocation flag for the kinds of provisions for health care costs included in child support. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D ECUSTAG2 2 562 T CS: Child custody arrangements CS70 What child custody arrangements does the child support agreement for (READ CHILD(REN) NAMES) specify? V 5 .Other V 4 .None V 3 .Child(ren) live with mother and V .with father V 2 .Child(Ren) live With father V 1 .Child(ren) Live with mother V -1 .Not in Universe D ACUSTAG2 1 564 T CS: Allocation flag for ECUSTAG2 CS70 Allocation flag for the child custody arrangements that the child support agreement for the child(ren)specifies. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D ESPENTM2 2 565 T CS: Time spent with other parent CS71 Does the child support agreement specify the amount of time that the child(ren) will spend with the other parent? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ASPENTM2 1 567 T CS: Allocation flag for ESPENTM2 CS71 Allocation flag for whether the child support agreement specifies the amount of time that the children will spend with the other parent. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D ESAMETM2 2 568 T CS: Time spent with other parent CS73 Did all the children spend about the same number of days with the other parent in the last 12 months? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ASAMETM2 1 570 T CS: Allocation flag for ESAMETM2 CS73 Allocation flag for whether the children spent about the same number of days with the other parent in the last 12 months. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EAMTTM21 3 571 T CS: Time spent with other parent in days CS74@DAYS What is the total amount of time that [read names of child(ren)] spent with the other parent for the last 12 months? V -1 .Not in Universe V 0:366 .Number of days D EAMTTM22 2 574 T CS: Time spent with other parent in weeks CS74@WEEKS What is the total amount of time that [read names of children] spent with the other parent from [month 4 of previous interview year] to [month 4 of the current interview year]? V -1 .Not in Universe V 0:52 .Number of weeks D EAMTTM23 2 576 T CS: Time spent with other parent in months CS74@MONTHS What is the total amount of time that [read name of children] spent with the other parent from [month 4 of previous interview year] to [month 4 of the current interview year]? V -1 .Not in Universe V 0:12 .Number of months D AAMTTM21 1 578 T CS: Allocation flag for EAMTTM21-EAMTTM23 CS74@DAYS, CS74@WEEKS, and CS74@MONTHS Allocation flag for the total amount of time spent with the other parent. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EDCRT101 2 579 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS77@1 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT102 2 581 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS77@2 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT103 2 583 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS77@3 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT104 2 585 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS77@4 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT105 2 587 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS77@5 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT106 2 589 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS77@6 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT107 2 591 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS77@7 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT108 2 593 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS77@8 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT109 2 595 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS77@9 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT110 2 597 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS77@10 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES101 2 599 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS78@1 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES102 2 601 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS78@2 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES103 2 603 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS78@3 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES104 2 605 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS78@4 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES105 2 607 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS78@5 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES106 2 609 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS78@6 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES107 2 611 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS78@7 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES108 2 613 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS78@8 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES109 2 615 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS78@9 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES110 2 617 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS78@10 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER101 2 619 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS79@1 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER102 2 621 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS79@2 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER103 2 623 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS79@3 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER104 2 625 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS79@4 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER105 2 627 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS79@5 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER106 2 629 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS79@6 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER107 2 631 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS79@7 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER108 2 633 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS79@8 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER109 2 635 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS79@9 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER110 2 637 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS79@10 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG101 2 639 T CS: Signature with father's name CS80@1 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG102 2 641 T CS: Signature with father's name CS80@2 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG103 2 643 T CS: Signature with father's name CS80@3 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG104 2 645 T CS: Signature with father's name CS80@4 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG105 2 647 T CS: Signature with father's name CS80@5 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG106 2 649 T CS: Signature with father's name CS80@6 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG107 2 651 T CS: Signature with father's name CS80@7 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG108 2 653 T CS: Signature with father's name CS80@8 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG109 2 655 T CS: Signature with father's name CS80@9 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG110 2 657 T CS: Signature with father's name CS80@10 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH101 2 659 T CS: Father signed other papers CS81@1 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH102 2 661 T CS: Father signed other papers CS81@2 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH103 2 663 T CS: Father signed other papers CS81@3 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH104 2 665 T CS: Father signed other papers CS81@4 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH105 2 667 T CS: Father signed other papers CS81@5 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH106 2 669 T CS: Father signed other papers CS81@6 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH107 2 671 T CS: Father signed other papers CS81@7 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH108 2 673 T CS: Father signed other papers CS81@8 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH109 2 675 T CS: Father signed other papers CS81@9 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH110 2 677 T CS: Father signed other papers CS81@10 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ADID101 1 679 T CS: Allocation flag for EDCRT101-EDCRT110 CS77@1-10-CS81@1-10 Allocation flag for EDCRT101-EDCRT110, EDTES101-EDTES110, EDCER101-EDCER110, EDSIG101-EDSIG110, and EDOTH101-EDOTH110 V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EDMAR1 2 680 T CS: Married to child's father CS83 [Was or were] ... ever married to ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ADMAR1 1 682 T CS: Allocation flag for EDMAR1 CS83 Allocation flag for EDMAR1 V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EDCRT201 2 683 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS84@1 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT202 2 685 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS84@2 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT203 2 687 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS84@3 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT204 2 689 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS84@4 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT205 2 691 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS84@5 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT206 2 693 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS84@6 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT207 2 695 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS84@7 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT208 2 697 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS84@8 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT209 2 699 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS84@9 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCRT210 2 701 T CS: Father identified by court ruling CS84@10 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a court ruling? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES201 2 703 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS85@1 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES202 2 705 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS85@2 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES203 2 707 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS85@3 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES204 2 709 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS85@4 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES205 2 711 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS85@5 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES206 2 713 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS85@6 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES207 2 715 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS85@7 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES208 2 717 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS85@8 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES209 2 719 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS85@9 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDTES210 2 721 T CS: Father identified by blood test CS85@10 Was ...'s father ever legally identified by a blood test or other genetic test? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER201 2 723 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS86@1 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER202 2 725 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS86@2 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER203 2 727 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS86@3 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER204 2 729 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS86@4 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER205 2 731 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS86@5 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER206 2 733 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS86@6 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER207 2 735 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS86@7 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER208 2 737 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS86@8 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER209 2 739 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS86@9 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDCER210 2 741 T CS: Signature on birth certificate CS86@10 Did...'s father ever write his OWN signature on the application for ...'s birth certificate? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG201 2 743 T CS: Signature with father's name CS87@1 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG202 2 745 T CS: Signature with father's name CS87@2 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG203 2 747 T CS: Signature with father's name CS87@3 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG204 2 749 T CS: Signature with father's name CS87@4 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG205 2 751 T CS: Signature with father's name CS87@5 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG206 2 753 T CS: Signature with father's name CS87@6 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG207 2 755 T CS: Signature with father's name CS87@7 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG208 2 757 T CS: Signature with father's name CS87@8 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG209 2 759 T CS: Signature with father's name CS87@9 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDSIG210 2 761 T CS: Signature with father's name CS87@10 Other than the application for a birth certificate, did ...'s father ever sign a statement or an affidavat that legally specifies that he is ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH201 2 763 T CS: Father signed other papers CS88@1 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH202 2 765 T CS: Father signed other papers CS88@2 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH203 2 767 T CS: Father signed other papers CS88@3 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH204 2 769 T CS: Father signed other papers CS88@4 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH205 2 771 T CS: Father signed other papers CS88@5 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH206 2 773 T CS: Father signed other papers CS88@6 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH207 2 775 T CS: Father signed other papers CS88@7 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH208 2 777 T CS: Father signed other papers CS88@8 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH209 2 779 T CS: Father signed other papers CS88@9 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EDOTH210 2 781 T CS: Father signed other papers CS88@10 Did ...'s father ever sign any other papers, such as insurance forms, a personal letter or a card, that could identify him as ...'s father? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ADID201 1 783 T CS: Allocation flag for EDCRT201-EDCRT210 CS84@1-10-CS88@1-10 Allocation flag for EDCRT201-EDCRT210, EDTES201-EDTES210, EDCER201-EDCER210, EDSIG201-EDSIG210, and EDOTH201-EDOTH210 V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EYNEVWR1 2 784 T CS: Reason: Legal paternity not established CS89@1 Why was this agreement for ... never put in writing? Because legal paternity was not established V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNEVWR2 2 786 T CS: Reason: Unable to locate parent CS89@2 Why was this agreement for...never put in writing? Because unable to locate parent V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNEVWR3 2 788 T CS: Reason: Other parent unable to pay CS89@3 Why was this agreement for ... never put in writing? Because other parent unable to pay V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNEVWR4 2 790 T CS: Reason: Final agreement pending CS89@4 Why was this agreement for ... never put in writing? Because final agreement pending V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNEVWR5 2 792 T CS: Property settlement in lieu of child support CS89@5 Why was this agreement for ... never put in writing? Accepted property settlement in lieu of child support V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNEVWR6 2 794 T CS: Reason: Did not want a legal child support award CS89@6 Why was this agreement for ... never put in writing? Because did not want a legal child support award V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNEVWR7 2 796 T CS: Reason: Did not try to get child support CS89@7 Why was this agreement for ... never put in writing? Because did not try to get child support V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D EYNEVWR8 2 798 T CS: Reason: Some other reason CS89@8 Why was this agreement for ... never put in writing? Because of some other reason? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D AYNEVWR1 1 800 T CS: Allocation flag for EYNEVWR1-EYNEVWR8. CS89@1-8 Allocation flag for EYNEVWR1-EYNEVWR8. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EWHERLV2 2 801 T CS: Other parent's residence CS90 Where does the other parent for this agreement now live? V 6 .Unknown V 5 .Other V 4 .Other parent now deceased V 3 .Different State V 2 .Same State (different county or V .city) V 1 .Same county or city V -1 .Not in Universe D AWHERLV2 1 803 T CS: Allocation flag for EWHERLV2 CS90 Allocation flag for where the other parent for this agreement now lives V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D ESTAGRE2 2 804 T CS: State where parent lives CS91 Does ... and the other parent still live in the same State or States where the initial child support agreement was reached? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ASTAGRE2 1 806 T CS: Allocation flag for ESTAGRE2 CS91 Allocation flag for whether the parent and the other parent still live in the same State or States where the initial child support agreement was reached. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EWHOMOV2 2 807 T CS: Person that moved CS92 Who moved? V 3 .Both subject person and other V .parent V 2 .Other parent V 1 .Subject person V -1 .Not in Universe D AWHOMOV2 1 809 T CS: Allocation flag for EWHOMOV2 CS92 Allocation flag for whether the subject person, other parent, or both subject person and other parent moved. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TAMTAG31 3 810 T CS: Dollar amount for the agreement CS94@AMT What was the dollar amount of that [those] agreement(s)? If paid weekly the top value is 100 If paid bi-weekly the top value is 250 If paid monthly the top value is 600 If paid yearly the value is 1 (suppressed for disclosure avoidance) V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:635 .Amount in dollars D EAMTAG32 2 813 T CS: Frequency of dollar amount CS94@1 What was the frequency of payment for that agreement? V 4 .Per year V 3 .Per month V 2 .Biweekly V 1 .Per week V -1 .Not in Universe D AAMTAG31 1 815 T CS: Allocation flag for TAMTAG31 AND EAMTAG32 CS94@AMT, CS94@1 Allocation flag for the dollar amount of the agreement after the last change and the frequency that dollar amount was paid V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D TACTREC3 4 816 T CS: Amount received in child support agreements CS97@AMT What is the total amount that ... actually received in child support payments under that agreement [or those agreements] during that period (last 12 months)? V 0 .None or not in universe V 1:4000 .Dollar amount D AACTREC3 1 820 T CS: Allocation flag for TACTREC3 CS97@AMT Allocation flag for the total amount that the parent actually received in child support payments under the agreement(s). V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EPUBSUPP 2 821 T CS: Help in obtaining child support CS100 For [this child or any of these children] have/has ... ever asked a public agency, such as the child support enforcement office or welfare agency, for help in obtaining child support? V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D APUBSUPP 1 823 T CS: Allocation flag for EPUBSUPP CS100 Allocation flag for whether the parent has ever asked a public agency for help in obtaining child support. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D ELASTASK 4 824 T CS: Last year for help CS101@YEAR In what year did ... LAST ASK for help V -1 .Not in Universe V 1984:2005 .Year the agreement was first V .reached D ALASTASK 1 828 T CS: Allocation flag for ELASTASK CS101@YEAR Allocation flag for the year the person last asked for help. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D ETYPASK1 2 829 T CS: Locate the other parent CS102@1 What type of help did ... ask for in...last contact? Locate the other parent V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ETYPASK2 2 831 T CS: Establish paternity CS102@2 What type of help did ... ask for in...last contact? Establish paternity V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ETYPASK3 2 833 T CS: Establish support obligation CS102@3 What type of help did ... ask for in...last contact? Establish support obligation V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ETYPASK4 2 835 T CS: Establish medical support CS102@4 What type of help did ... ask for in...last contact? Establish medical support V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ETYPASK5 2 837 T CS: Enforce support order CS102@5 What type of help did ... ask for in...last contact? Enforce support order V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ETYPASK6 2 839 T CS: Modify order CS102@6 What type of help did ... ask for in...last contact? Modify order V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ETYPASK7 2 841 T CS: Other reason CS102@7 What type of help did ... ask for in...last contact? Other reason. V 2 .No V 1 .Yes V -1 .Not in Universe D ATYPASK 1 843 T CS: Allocation flag for ETYPASK1-ETYPASK7 CS102 Allocation flag for type of help the person asked for in their last contact. V 3 .Logical imputation (derivation) V 2 .Cold deck imputation V 1 .Statistical imputation (hot deck) V 0 .Not imputed D EHELPSYN 2 844 T CS: Help received from agency CS103 Did ... receive any help from the agency as a result of ...